August
27, 2014
Mr. Doug Chatkevys
City Manager
Dana Point
Dear
Doug,
The
Majestic Project has started off on the wrong foot. There
has been some positive progress but vital issues still need to be negotiated
and resolved before final approval should be sought.
The
Planning Commission and City Council are part time jobs that rely on competent,
professional staff to do a thorough job of analyzing submissions of developers
on major projects. The staff report
should represent the interests of the total community (residents, visitors, and
businesses).
To move
the Majestic Project forward, the staff report should examine all the outstanding
issues in the project. Each issue
should be developed to highlight alternative solutions. The city staff should then justify its
recommended course of action. The following issues, many of which were not
addressed by the City Staff, need to be covered:
1.
Fourth
story variance versus Town Center Plan (3) - adds 40 condos
2.
Height
Variances – to serve small roof decks in a corner of each building the numerous roof towers
for stair wells and elevators reach up to 56 feet above ground level; parapets
and decorative walls on roof require variances to the Town Center Plan (TCP);
reference levels for height are based on PCH elevations for lots on Del Prado
adding 4 to 5 feet to height; projection of equipment screening requested over
the 42” limit
3.
No
Loading Zones
4.
Floor
Area Ratio variance required – Phase 2
& 3 exceed 2.5 limit in Town Center Plan zoning code
5.
Parking
– Community Development reduced the requirements on the developer without
analysis or justification – 12 spaces on Lantern streets credited to developer,
23 guest spaces required by zoning eliminated, 10 parking space requirements
eliminated because bicycle spaces were provided
6.
Set
Back requirements for floors over 30 feet – all three phases violate the
requirement to be set back 10 feet from lower floors on street fronts
7.
Ratio
of Condos to Retail and Restaurant – Town Center Plan emphasized “pedestrian
friendly”, “small town village atmosphere” with about 1/3 retail and restaurant
and 2/3 office and residential (237 residences in entire Town Center estimated)
– Majestic Project jams 111 condos on to 2.2 acres of the 75 acre Town Center –
12% of building area is retail & restaurant and 88% condos
8.
Long
Term Parking Solution – Town Center Plan says to “create additional public
parking which would include one and preferably two facilities prior to
beginning roadway construction” – the City has failed to take action to
positively identify any long term parking, yet is ready to sell in lieu parking
to developers at 25% of estimated cost – this forces overflow parking into the
neighborhoods
9.
Traffic
Impact – Community Development has not analyzed the effect on traffic of the
project to identify issues and solutions – narrower streets, congested access
to parking garages, no loading zones, stop signs and elimination of Violet
Lantern left turn intersection
10. Give Away of Alley – Community Development
proposed to give the developer the alley right of way to build 2 stories of
condos over it and 2 layers of parking under the alley with no compensation to
Dana Point such as providing extra public parking
11.
Town
Center Plan requires story poling for all encroachments over 40 feet
City
Staff should be negotiating with Majestic Development to move the proposed
project to meet the needs of Dana Point.
The Planning Commission and public meeting should be held only when the
full staff report (approved by the City Manager) and the finalized proposal
from Majestic are available. These must
be published to the Commissioners and the public for at least one week prior to
a meeting where approval is being sought.
This
project could shape the character of the Town Center/Lantern District for the
next 50 years. The City Manager should
lead the way to success by defining a process to review major development
projects such as Majestic and the Doheny Hotel. This process must identify all issues early
and then negotiate for Dana Point with the developer to minimize or eliminate variances
and then gain approval for the major project.
The Planning Commission or City Council can provide wise judgments on
final approvals if the City Staff does a thorough, professional job. This will lead to rapid approval with
community support for worthy projects.
Sincerely,
Buck
Hill